![]() |
|||||
| Officers | Board of Directors | Welcome | EAM Fellows | Past Presidents | |
| Affiliated Organizations | Standing Committees and Program Tracks | ||||
| Outstanding Paper Nominations | Experiential Learning Association | ||||
| Case Association | Reviewers | Outstanding Paper Review Process | |||
| Conference Activities | Conference Sessions | ||||
| Detail
Program: |
|||||
| Officers | |||||
| Bonita Betters-Reed,
Simmons College President |
|||||
| Eileen Kaplan,
Montclair State U. President-Elect |
|||||
| Joel Harmon, Fairleigh-Dickinson U. Vice-President, Program |
Theodore Peters, U. of New Hampshire Vice-President, Membership |
| Steven I. Meisel, LaSalle U. Vice-President, Program-Elect |
Deanna Geddes, Temple U. Vice-President, Local Arrangements |
| Cheryl L. Tromley, Fairfield U. Treasurer |
Gayle Porter, Rutgers U.-Camden Vice-President at Large |
| Board of Directors | ||
| 1999 | 2000 | 2001 |
| Mariann (Sam) Jelinek College of William and Mary Judith Neal David Palmer |
Elizabeth Cooper U. of Rhode Island Joy Schneer Joan Weiner |
Judith Gordon Boston College Alison Konrad Theodore Peridis |
| EAM Fellows | ||
| Carolyn R. Dexter William P. Ferris Martin J. Gannon David H. Holt Mariann Jelinek |
Michael J. Kavanagh D. Jeffrey Lenn Joseph Litterer David D. Palmer Gary N. Powell |
Joseph Seltzer Henry P. Sims, Jr. John F. Veiga Heidi Vernon John N. Yanouzas |
| Past Presidents | ||
| John G. Hutchinson Dean F. Berry Charles E. Summer Walter A. Hill C. Wickham Skinner Harold Lazarus Ogden Hall Stanley Young Rocco Carzo, Jr. M. William Frey John W. Slocum, Jr. |
John N. Yanouzas Martin J. Gannon Don Hellriegel Louis K. Bragaw Mahmoud A. Wahba Joseph A. Alutto Henry P. Sims, Jr. Mariann Jelinek John F. Veiga Randall S. Schuler Gary N. Powell |
Carolyn R. Dexter Michael J. Kavanagh D. Jeffrey Lenn Nicholas J. Beutell Eugene G. Gomolka Joseph Seltzer William P. Ferris Craig C. Lundberg D. Anthony Butterfield David D. Palmer Joan Weiner Alison Konrad |
| Affiliated Organizations | |
| CASE Association, Barry Armandi, SUNY at Old Westbury, President |
Experiential Learning Association, Joe Seltzer, LaSalle U., Chair |
| EAM Womens Network, Cynthia Krom, Mount St. Mary College, Chair |
|
| Standing Committees and Program Tracks | |
| Program VP: Joel Harmon, Fairleigh-Dickinson U. Kelly L. Vostal, Fairleigh-Dickinson U. |
Life-Giving Workplace Judi Neal, U. of New Haven Drew Harris, Fairleigh-Dickinson U. |
| Business Strategy &
Entrepreneurship Frances Amatucci, Salem State College |
Academic-Practitioner Collaboration Dan Twomey, Fairleigh-Dickinson U. |
Case Association
(CASE) |
Doctoral Student Consortium D. Jeffrey Lenn, George Washington U. |
| Dialogue & Synergy Sessions Susan M. Schor, Pace U. |
Proceedings Editor Priscilla Elsass, Clark U |
| Experiential Learning Joe Seltzer, LaSalle U. |
Newsletter Editor |
| Human Resource Management Gwen E. Jones, Fairleigh-Dickinson U. |
Cyberspace Coordinator Jerzy Letkowski, Western New England College |
| International Management Mahesh Joshi, St. Josephs U. |
Local Arrangements VP: Deanna Geddes, Temple U. Lisa Corrigall, Temple U. Elizabeth Davis, St. Josephs U. Alison Konrad, Temple U. Evan Leach, West Chester U. Charles McGee, West Chester U. Steven Meisel, LaSalle U. Gayle Porter, Rutgers U. Camden Joseph Seltzer, LaSalle U. Anca Turcanu, U. of Pennsylvania Walt Tymon, Drexel U. Joan Weiner, Drexel U Monica Zimmerman, Temple U. |
| Management Education &
Development William Ferris, Western New England College |
|
| Organization Theory & Change Diana Stork, U. Mass. Dartmouth |
|
| Organization Behavior Jeanie Forray, Eastern Connecticut State U. |
|
| Social Issues Debra R. Comer, Hofstra U. |
|
| Gender & Diversity Debra R. Comer, Hofstra U. |
|
| Technology & Innovation Eric H. Kessler, Pace U. |
Membership Theodore Peters, U. of New Hampshire |
| Works in Progress Edward W. Christensen, Monmouth U. |
Outstanding Paper Awards Tony Butterfield, U. Mass Amherst Dave Palmer, U. of Connecticut Joan Weiner, Drexel U. |
|
WELCOME TO THE 36TH ANNUAL MEETING OF THE EASTERN ACADEMY OF MANAGEMENT |
|
The
Life-Giving Workplace |
| This year's theme - The Life-Giving Workplace - signifies a passion for generating work contexts that unleash human energy and excellence. It calls us to distinguish and acknowledge the core qualities of such contexts through inquiry, and invites us to be these qualities in our actions…our teaching, consulting and practice. It stands for the possibility of turning vision into reality. |
| Woven into the fabric of our conference, thanks to the creative energy of theme coordinators Judi Neal and Drew Harris, are activities that may allow us to experience what is perhaps a signature quality of life-giving contexts…the alignment of mind-body-spirit. Examples are The Labyrinth, massage, meditation, and rhythmic drumming. Numerous sessions explore the theme from a variety of intellectual perspectives. Our internationally-respected executive speaker, Judi Wicks, shares the challenges and rewards of trying to create life-giving organizations. A Sunday-morning session allows us to reflect collectively on our experiences and learning throughout the conference. We hope you will join us on the journey. |
| Don't miss the fullest program of enriching pre-conference activities we have ever had. In addition to the doctoral consortium led by Jeff Lenn, there are terrific workshops on case writing, outdoor-adventure experiential learning, Internet-based teaching, and collaborative action research. The main program blends the added vitality of newcomers with distinguished veterans who have contributed so much to us and their fields over the years. Featured this year (thanks to the initiative of Craig Lundberg and Joan Weiner) are distinguished scholars Bill Starbuck and Mariann (Sam) Jelinek. Also featured (thanks to the unceasing commitment of Dan Twomey) is the academic-practitioner track on Friday, which brings together executives and academics to collaborate on developing action-research projects. |
| A warm sense of community has always been the signature of EAM. Providing opportunities to renew acquaintances and begin new ones are: a Thursday evening reception (honoring Bonnie Betters-Reed) followed by buffet dinner; a Friday welcome luncheon buffet; and a gala colonial-style reception on Friday evening. And look for EAM's famous impromptu evening songfests (which some believe is the main reason why so many submit their papers). |
| Deepest thanks are due to my awesome Program Committee who brought so much life to the work and to the program: to Deanna Geddes and her outstanding local arrangements group for their dedication, collaborative spirit, and competence in creating a "seamless conference," to Kelly Vostal for her support, commitment, and hard work in bringing everything together, to Bonnie Betters-Reed and Eileen Kaplan for showing the way, and to Steve Meisel who I know will do a great job in 2000 having done so much of it this year. |
| Joel Harmon Vice-President, Program, 1999 |
| Outstanding Paper
Nominations Denoted with * in Program |
|
| Conceptual | |
| Hao Ma (Bryant College), "Types of Competition, Competitive Advantage, and Theories of Strategy: A Multilevel Theoretical Synthesis." | |
| This article identifies three major gaps in the literature on competitive advantage and strategy. They are the relative lack of attention to: the gaining of competitive advantage through competition; temporal competitive advantage; and the situational nature of strategizing. It then attempts a multi-level theoretical synthesis of literature on competition, competitive advantage, and theories of strategy. At the general level, it juxtaposes the Porterian, Williamsonian, Chamberlinian, and Schumpeterian competitive, and integrates the IO structural approach efficiency based view, the resource based view, and the Schumperterian view, suggesting the adoption of multi-perspective strategizing. At the practical application level, it offers a situational theory of strategy, advocating matching strategizing with specific types of competitive environments. A typology of strategizing is then developed that includes: to win without fight; to win by redefining the game; to win by competitive maneuvering and economizing; and to win a war through a series of maneuvering. At the operational level, it presents an action based working model of strategizing that includes entrepreneurial vision, action, capability, and opportunity as its building blocks. | |
| Alison M. Konrad (Temple U.) and Gerald Ross (Temple U.), "Organizational Justice and Inter-Group Inequality." | |
| Using social identity theory, we develop a conceptual framework for applying organizational justice concepts to the problem of inter-group inequality. The organizational justice literature extends research on inter-group inequality by adding a focus on procedural justice. The inter-group inequality literature extends organizational justice concepts by calling attention to group interests. Thirteen propositions are developed to guide future research. Members of different identity groups might respond differently to organizational justice factors. Perceptions that one's group has been treated unjustly might affect attitudes and behavior toward the organization. | |
| Empirical | |
| Hitoshi Mitsuhashi (Cornell U.), Hyeon Jeong Park (Cornell U.), Patrick M. Wright (Cornell U.), "Line and HR Executives Perceptions of HR Effectiveness in Firms in the Peoples Republic of China." | |
| This paper examines the differences in perceptions of the importance and effectiveness of HR practices in firms operating in the Peoples Republic of China. The major finding is that while line and HR executives equally value HR practices, line executives perceive HR effectiveness to be significantly lower than do HR executives. The implications of these findings are discussed. | |
| Pamela Brandes (Southern Connecticut State U.), Ravi Dharwadkar (Syracuse U.), and James W. Dean (U. of North Carolina, Chapel Hill), "Does Organizational Cynicism Matter?: Employee and Supervisor Perspectives on Work Outcomes." | |
| Recent conceptual work in management has highlighted the importance of cynicism in the workplace but few studies have explored the relationships of cynicism with important work outcomes such as organizational commitment, in and extra-role behaviors, and employee involvement activities. Data from 129 supervisor-subordinate dyads was used to explore these relationships. Results suggest that employees and supervisors discern the influence of cynicism differently. Cynical employees report less commitment to their organizations and reduced participation in employee involvement programs. Supervisors suggest that cynical employees in-role behaviors are curtailed. As these findings have important organizational implications, we make recommendations for studying cynicism in the future. | |
| Gary Blau (Temple U.), "Testing the Longitudinal Impact of Work Variables and Performance Appraisal Satisfaction on Subsequent Overall Job Satisfaction." | |
| Using a longitudinal sample of medical technologists (MTs) this study found, after controlling for prior overall job satisfactions, individual difference and organization-level variables, that task responsibilities and employee performance appraisal satisfaction significantly affected subsequent overall MT job satisfaction. Overall job satisfaction significantly declined for repeat-respondents over the four-year period. Data also suggested that the impact of task responsibilities on overall job satisfaction can dissipate over time, and that the supervisors role in affecting employee job satisfaction is important. Results and limitations are discussed. | |
| Management Education and Development | |
| Ned S. Schwartz (Western New England College), "DNA Management: A Natural Paradigm for the Strategic Management Course." | |
| This paper presents a prospectus for an original complementary paradigm for teaching the Business Policy and Strategic Management course, using the scientific metaphor of DNA as the basic building blocks of life, including genetic mapping, analysis and re-engineering. The DNA management teaching model is proposed for those interested in an organic model and seek additional pedagogical support for their Strategic Management course. The metaphor assumes every living organization possesses unique DNA characteristics, much like every living organism. These genetic characteristics are considered organizational DNA. Although competing organizations may have similar genetic attributes, no two organizations have identical DNA therefore, DNA Management provides the opportunity for customized strategic assessment, analysis, planning and management. The DNA Management teaching model utilizes dynamic computerized templates and is designed for case studies. | |
| Cheryl C. McLean (U. of Massachusetts - Amherst), "A Performance Appraisal Exercise with Punch!: A Two Part Exercise on Creating and Using Evaluations." | |
| This exercise allows students to understand the issues and obstacles associated with developing usable performance appraisals and give students the opportunity to experience the 360 degree performance evaluation process. Since students grades are directly affected by the outcomes of the appraisals, this exercise has a powerful impact. | |
| Raquel Benbunan-Fich (Seton Hall U.), "Leveraging Management Education with Information Technology." | |
| New Information Technologies (IT) can be incorporated into management education to enhance the quality of the learning experience. This paper reviews the theoretical and empirical research on computer-supported learning and examines the implications for management education. This paper also discusses IT applications in and out of the classroom and pays special attention to how IT can contribute to the use of the case study method of teaching. The contribution of this paper is the integration of different IT applications in educational settings in a tri-dimensional framework defined by the pedagogical assumptions of the course, the time dimension of the communications between students and professors, and the geographical dispersion of the participants. | |
| Experiential
Learning Association BEST EXPERIENTIAL EXERCISE AWARD NOMINATIONS Denoted with * in Program |
| Conceptual |
| Karen E. Boroff, (Seton Hall U.), "The
Creativity Exercise."
Cheryl C. McLean (U. of Massachusetts Amherst), "A Performance Appraisal Exercise with Punch!: A Two Part Exercise on Creating and Using Evaluations." Kathleen L. Pereles (Visiting Rutgers U.-Camden), "Experiential Exercise: Acquiring the Skills and Knowledge Needed to Facilitate Effective Groups." |
| Case Association BEST CASE-IN-PROGRESS AWARD NOMINATIONS Denoted with * in Program |
| Donald Grunewald (Iona College), "Joes
First Bank." Craig Lundberg (Cornell U.), "Julies Call." Herbert Sherman (Long Island U.), "Where has all the Money Gone." |
| Outstanding Paper Review Process |
| When reviewers evaluated EAM submissions they also made nominations for outstanding empirical, conceptual and management education paper awards (using the "standards of excellence" noted below). After screening by the Program Committee, a final list of nominations was forwarded for blind review by an Outstanding Papers Award Committee consisting of past presidents D. Anthony Butterfield, David Palmer, and Joan Weiner. The outstanding paper awards will be announced at the Presidential Luncheon during the Annual Conference (noon-1:45pm, Saturday) |
| Note: For the EAM Outstanding Paper
Awards, the following review criteria were applied: Any such paper would have several of the following attributes -- It would 1) be extremely well written and well organized, 2) address an issue, problem or phenomena of major importance, 3) demonstrate superior understanding of the relevant literature, and 4) have a strong explicit theoretical base. If conceptual, the paper also would 5) present a superior conceptual framework or propositions to facilitate further research, and 6) persuasively show how it creates, refines, links or extends conceptualization. If empirical, the paper also would: 5) use an exceptionally strong research strategy/design and methods, and 6) carefully explicate the practical or theoretical meanings of the project. If management education, the paper also would: 5) carefully describe the intended purpose, audiences and contexts, and 6) include helpful descriptions of experiences with the materials, if appropriate (e.g., exercises). |